Generative Expert System

Improvements in transformer-based deep neural networks, particularly big language models (LLMs), enabled an AI boom of generative AI systems in the early 2020s. These consist of chatbots such as ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, and LLaMA; text-to-image expert system image generation systems such as Stable Diffusion, Midjourney, and DALL-E; and text-to-video AI generators such as Sora. [9] [10] [11] [12] Companies such as OpenAI, Anthropic, Microsoft, Google, and Baidu along with various smaller sized firms have actually developed generative AI models. [7] [13] [14]

Generative AI has uses throughout a wide variety of industries, including software application advancement, healthcare, financing, entertainment, customer care, [15] sales and marketing, [16] art, composing, [17] fashion, [18] and product style. [19] However, concerns have actually been raised about the possible misuse of generative AI such as cybercrime, making use of phony news or deepfakes to trick or manipulate people, and the mass replacement of human tasks. [20] [21] Intellectual residential or commercial property law concerns also exist around generative models that are trained on and emulate copyrighted masterpieces. [22]

Early history

Since its inception, scientists in the field have raised philosophical and ethical arguments about the nature of the human mind and the repercussions of creating synthetic beings with human-like intelligence; these concerns have actually previously been checked out by misconception, fiction and viewpoint since antiquity. [23] The principle of automatic art go back at least to the robot of ancient Greek civilization, where creators such as Daedalus and Hero of Alexandria were explained as having developed devices capable of composing text, generating noises, and playing music. [24] [25] The tradition of innovative automations has grown throughout history, exemplified by Maillardet’s automaton created in the early 1800s. [26] Markov chains have long been used to design natural languages since their development by Russian mathematician Andrey Markov in the early 20th century. Markov published his very first paper on the topic in 1906, [27] [28] and examined the pattern of vowels and consonants in the unique Eugeny Onegin utilizing Markov chains. Once a Markov chain is found out on a text corpus, it can then be utilized as a probabilistic text generator. [29] [30]

Academic expert system

The academic discipline of expert system was developed at a research workshop held at Dartmouth College in 1956 and has experienced numerous waves of development and optimism in the decades considering that. [31] Expert system research started in the 1950s with works like Computing Machinery and Intelligence (1950) and the 1956 Dartmouth Summer Research Project on AI. Since the 1950s, artists and scientists have used expert system to develop creative works. By the early 1970s, Harold Cohen was creating and showing generative AI works produced by AARON, the computer program Cohen created to create paintings. [32]

The terms generative AI preparation or generative preparation were utilized in the 1980s and 1990s to describe AI preparing systems, specifically computer-aided procedure planning, utilized to create series of actions to reach a specified goal. [33] [34] Generative AI preparation systems used symbolic AI techniques such as state space search and constraint complete satisfaction and were a “relatively mature” technology by the early 1990s. They were used to create crisis action prepare for military use, [35] procedure prepare for manufacturing [33] and decision plans such as in prototype autonomous spacecraft. [36]

Generative neural nets (2014-2019)

Since its creation, the field of artificial intelligence utilized both discriminative designs and generative designs, to model and anticipate information. Beginning in the late 2000s, the development of deep knowing drove development and research in image classification, speech acknowledgment, natural language processing and other tasks. Neural networks in this era were usually trained as discriminative designs, due to the difficulty of generative modeling. [37]

In 2014, advancements such as the variational autoencoder and generative adversarial network produced the very first practical deep neural networks efficient in learning generative models, as opposed to discriminative ones, for complicated information such as images. These deep generative models were the very first to output not only class labels for images but likewise whole images.

In 2017, the Transformer network allowed advancements in generative designs compared to older Long-Short Term Memory models, [38] resulting in the first generative pre-trained transformer (GPT), referred to as GPT-1, in 2018. [39] This was followed in 2019 by GPT-2 which showed the capability to generalize not being watched to many various jobs as a Foundation design. [40]

The new generative models introduced throughout this period enabled large neural networks to be trained utilizing unsupervised learning or semi-supervised knowing, instead of the monitored learning typical of discriminative designs. Unsupervised learning got rid of the need for people to by hand label data, allowing for bigger networks to be trained. [41]

Generative AI boom (2020-)

In March 2020, 15. ai, produced by an anonymous MIT researcher, was a free web application that might generate convincing character voices utilizing very little training information. [42] The platform is credited as the very first mainstream service to promote AI voice cloning (audio deepfakes) in memes and content production, influencing subsequent developments in voice AI innovation. [43] [44]

In 2021, the emergence of DALL-E, a transformer-based pixel generative model, marked an advance in AI-generated images. [45] This was followed by the releases of Midjourney and Stable Diffusion in 2022, which even more democratized access to top quality expert system art production from natural language triggers. [46] These systems showed unmatched capabilities in creating photorealistic images, artwork, and designs based upon text descriptions, leading to prevalent adoption amongst artists, designers, and the public.

In late 2022, the general public release of ChatGPT changed the accessibility and application of generative AI for general-purpose text-based jobs. [47] The system’s capability to take part in natural conversations, create creative content, assist with coding, and perform various analytical jobs caught international attention and sparked widespread discussion about AI’s prospective influence on work, education, and imagination. [48]

In March 2023, GPT-4’s release represented another dive in generative AI capabilities. A group from Microsoft Research controversially argued that it “might fairly be seen as an early (yet still incomplete) variation of a synthetic basic intelligence (AGI) system.” [49] However, this assessment was objected to by other scholars who maintained that generative AI stayed “still far from reaching the standard of ‘basic human intelligence'” as of 2023. [50] Later in 2023, Meta launched ImageBind, an AI design integrating numerous modalities consisting of text, images, video, thermal data, 3D data, audio, and movement, paving the method for more immersive generative AI applications. [51]

In December 2023, Google unveiled Gemini, a multimodal AI model readily available in 4 versions: Ultra, Pro, Flash, and Nano. [52] The business integrated Gemini Pro into its Bard chatbot and revealed strategies for “Bard Advanced” powered by the larger Gemini Ultra model. [53] In February 2024, Google unified Bard and Duet AI under the Gemini brand name, launching a mobile app on Android and integrating the service into the Google app on iOS. [54]

In March 2024, Anthropic launched the Claude 3 family of large language models, including Claude 3 Haiku, Sonnet, and Opus. [55] The designs demonstrated considerable improvements in capabilities throughout different standards, with Claude 3 Opus significantly exceeding leading models from OpenAI and Google. [56] In June 2024, Anthropic released Claude 3.5 Sonnet, which demonstrated enhanced performance compared to the larger Claude 3 Opus, particularly in areas such as coding, multistep workflows, and image analysis. [57]

According to a survey by SAS and Coleman Parkes Research, China has emerged as a worldwide leader in generative AI adoption, with 83% of Chinese respondents using the technology, surpassing both the international average of 54% and the U.S. rate of 65%. This management is further evidenced by China’s copyright advancements in the field, with a UN report exposing that Chinese entities submitted over 38,000 generative AI patents from 2014 to 2023, substantially exceeding the United States in patent applications. [58]

Modalities

A generative AI system is constructed by using not being watched artificial intelligence (conjuring up for circumstances neural network architectures such as generative adversarial networks (GANs), variation autoencoders (VAEs), transformers, or self-supervised machine discovering trained on a dataset. The capabilities of a generative AI system depend upon the technique or kind of the information set used. Generative AI can be either unimodal or multimodal; unimodal systems take just one type of input, whereas multimodal systems can take more than one kind of input. [59] For instance, one version of OpenAI’s GPT-4 accepts both text and image inputs. [60]

Text

Generative AI systems trained on words or word tokens include GPT-3, GPT-4, GPT-4o, LaMDA, LLaMA, BLOOM, Gemini and others (see List of large language models). They are capable of natural language processing, machine translation, and natural language generation and can be utilized as foundation models for other tasks. [62] Data sets include BookCorpus, Wikipedia, and others (see List of text corpora).

Code

In addition to natural language text, big language models can be trained on programs language text, permitting them to generate source code for new computer programs. [63] Examples consist of OpenAI Codex and the VS Code fork Cursor. [64]

Images

Producing top quality visual art is a popular application of generative AI. [65] Generative AI systems trained on sets of images with text captions include Imagen, DALL-E, Midjourney, Adobe Firefly, FLUX.1, Stable Diffusion and others (see Expert system art, Generative art, and Synthetic media). They are typically used for text-to-image generation and neural style transfer. [66] Datasets include LAION-5B and others (see List of datasets in computer vision and image processing).

Audio

Generative AI can also be trained thoroughly on audio clips to produce natural-sounding speech synthesis and text-to-speech capabilities. An early leader in this field was 15. ai, introduced in March 2020, which showed the ability to clone character voices using as low as 15 seconds of training information. [67] The website acquired extensive attention for its capability to produce mentally expressive speech for various imaginary characters, though it was later taken offline in 2022 due to copyright concerns. [68] [69] [70] Commercial options subsequently emerged, including ElevenLabs’ context-aware synthesis tools and Meta Platform’s Voicebox. [71]

Generative AI systems such as MusicLM [72] and MusicGen [73] can also be trained on the audio waveforms of documented music in addition to text annotations, in order to generate new musical samples based upon text descriptions such as a soothing violin tune backed by a distorted guitar riff.

Music

Audio deepfakes of lyrics have been produced, like the song Savages, which utilized AI to imitate rapper Jay-Z’s vocals. Music artist’s instrumentals and lyrics are copyrighted however their voices aren’t safeguarded from regenerative AI yet, raising a debate about whether artists need to get royalties from audio deepfakes. [74]

Many AI music generators have actually been produced that can be produced utilizing a text expression, category options, and looped libraries of bars and riffs. [75]

Video

Generative AI trained on annotated video can generate temporally-coherent, comprehensive and photorealistic video clips. Examples include Sora by OpenAI, [12] Gen-1 and Gen-2 by Runway, [76] and Make-A-Video by Meta Platforms. [77]

Actions

Generative AI can likewise be trained on the motions of a robotic system to produce new trajectories for motion planning or navigation. For instance, UniPi from Google Research utilizes prompts like “select up blue bowl” or “clean plate with yellow sponge” to manage motions of a robot arm. [78] Multimodal “vision-language-action” models such as Google’s RT-2 can carry out basic reasoning in response to user triggers and visual input, such as choosing up a toy dinosaur when given the prompt choice up the extinct animal at a table filled with toy animals and other things. [79]

3D modeling

Artificially intelligent computer-aided style (CAD) can use text-to-3D, image-to-3D, and video-to-3D to automate 3D modeling. [80] AI-based CAD libraries might likewise be developed using linked open information of schematics and diagrams. [81] AI CAD assistants are utilized as tools to help improve workflow. [82]

Software and hardware

Generative AI models are utilized to power chatbot items such as ChatGPT, programs tools such as GitHub Copilot, [83] text-to-image items such as Midjourney, and text-to-video items such as Runway Gen-2. [84] Generative AI functions have actually been integrated into a variety of existing commercially available products such as Microsoft Office (Microsoft Copilot), [85] Google Photos, [86] and the Adobe Suite (Adobe Firefly). [87] Many generative AI models are likewise available as open-source software, including Stable Diffusion and the LLaMA [88] language model.

Smaller generative AI models with up to a couple of billion criteria can run on smartphones, ingrained devices, and personal computers. For instance, LLaMA-7B (a variation with 7 billion criteria) can run on a Raspberry Pi 4 [89] and one variation of Stable Diffusion can operate on an iPhone 11. [90]

Larger designs with 10s of billions of criteria can run on laptop computer or desktop. To accomplish an appropriate speed, designs of this size may need accelerators such as the GPU chips produced by NVIDIA and AMD or the Neural Engine included in Apple silicon items. For instance, the 65 billion parameter version of LLaMA can be configured to run on a desktop PC. [91]

The advantages of running generative AI locally consist of defense of privacy and copyright, and avoidance of rate restricting and censorship. The subreddit r/LocalLLaMA in specific focuses on utilizing consumer-grade video gaming graphics cards [92] through such methods as compression. That online forum is among only 2 sources Andrej Karpathy trusts for language design benchmarks. [93] Yann LeCun has actually advocated open-source models for their value to vertical applications [94] and for improving AI security. [95]

Language designs with hundreds of billions of specifications, such as GPT-4 or PaLM, typically run on datacenter computer systems equipped with varieties of GPUs (such as NVIDIA’s H100) or AI accelerator chips (such as Google’s TPU). These large designs are normally accessed as cloud services over the Internet.

In 2022, the United States New Export Controls on Advanced Computing and Semiconductors to China enforced restrictions on exports to China of GPU and AI accelerator chips utilized for generative AI. [96] Chips such as the NVIDIA A800 [97] and the Biren Technology BR104 [98] were developed to fulfill the requirements of the sanctions.

There is totally free software application on the marketplace efficient in recognizing text created by generative expert system (such as GPTZero), in addition to images, audio or video originating from it. [99] Potential mitigation techniques for detecting generative AI content include digital watermarking, content authentication, information retrieval, and artificial intelligence classifier models. [100] Despite claims of precision, both complimentary and paid AI text detectors have actually often produced incorrect positives, mistakenly accusing trainees of submitting AI-generated work. [101] [102]

Law and guideline

In the United States, a group of companies consisting of OpenAI, Alphabet, and Meta signed a voluntary agreement with the Biden administration in July 2023 to watermark AI-generated content. [103] In October 2023, Executive Order 14110 used the Defense Production Act to need all US companies to report info to the federal government when training certain high-impact AI designs. [104] [105]

In the European Union, the proposed Artificial Intelligence Act consists of requirements to divulge copyrighted product utilized to train generative AI systems, and to identify any AI-generated output as such. [106] [107]

In China, the Interim Measures for the Management of Generative AI Services introduced by the Cyberspace Administration of China manages any public-facing generative AI. It consists of requirements to watermark generated images or videos, guidelines on training information and label quality, limitations on personal data collection, and a guideline that generative AI need to “follow socialist core worths”. [108] [109]

Copyright

Training with copyrighted material

Generative AI systems such as ChatGPT and Midjourney are trained on big, openly available datasets that include copyrighted works. AI developers have actually argued that such training is protected under fair usage, while copyright holders have argued that it infringes their rights. [110]

Proponents of reasonable use training have argued that it is a transformative usage and does not include making copies of copyrighted works readily available to the general public. [110] Critics have argued that image generators such as Midjourney can create nearly-identical copies of some copyrighted images, [111] which generative AI programs complete with the material they are trained on. [112]

As of 2024, several claims related to using copyrighted product in training are continuous. Getty Images has actually sued Stability AI over using its images to train Stable diffusion. [113] Both the Authors Guild and The New York City Times have taken legal action against Microsoft and OpenAI over making use of their works to train ChatGPT. [114] [115]

Copyright of AI-generated material

A different question is whether AI-generated works can certify for copyright protection. The United States Copyright Office has ruled that works produced by synthetic intelligence with no human input can not be copyrighted, due to the fact that they lack human authorship. [116] However, the office has actually likewise begun taking public input to identify if these guidelines need to be fine-tuned for generative AI. [117]

Concerns

The development of generative AI has actually raised concerns from governments, businesses, and individuals, leading to demonstrations, legal actions, calls to pause AI experiments, and actions by multiple federal governments. In a July 2023 rundown of the United Nations Security Council, Secretary-General António Guterres stated “Generative AI has massive potential for good and evil at scale”, that AI may “turbocharge international advancement” and contribute in between $10 and $15 trillion to the international economy by 2030, however that its destructive use “might trigger horrific levels of death and destruction, widespread injury, and deep mental damage on an unimaginable scale”. [118]

Job losses

From the early days of the development of AI, there have been arguments put forward by ELIZA creator Joseph Weizenbaum and others about whether jobs that can be done by computer systems in fact should be done by them, offered the distinction in between computers and human beings, and in between quantitative calculations and qualitative, value-based judgements. [120] In April 2023, it was reported that image generation AI has resulted in 70% of the jobs for computer game illustrators in China being lost. [121] [122] In July 2023, developments in generative AI added to the 2023 Hollywood labor disagreements. Fran Drescher, president of the Screen Actors Guild, declared that “synthetic intelligence postures an existential hazard to imaginative occupations” throughout the 2023 SAG-AFTRA strike. [123] Voice generation AI has been viewed as a potential obstacle to the voice acting sector. [124] [125]

The intersection of AI and employment concerns among underrepresented groups worldwide remains an important aspect. While AI guarantees efficiency enhancements and skill acquisition, issues about task displacement and prejudiced recruiting procedures continue amongst these groups, as detailed in studies by Fast Company. To take advantage of AI for a more fair society, proactive steps include mitigating biases, promoting transparency, respecting privacy and consent, and accepting varied teams and ethical considerations. Strategies include rerouting policy emphasis on policy, inclusive style, and education’s capacity for tailored teaching to optimize advantages while reducing harms. [126]

Racial and gender predisposition

Generative AI designs can show and magnify any cultural bias present in the underlying information. For instance, a language model might assume that medical professionals and judges are male, and that secretaries or nurses are female, if those predispositions are common in the training information. [127] Similarly, an image design triggered with the text “an image of a CEO” may disproportionately create images of white male CEOs, [128] if trained on a racially prejudiced data set. A variety of techniques for reducing bias have been attempted, such as modifying input triggers [129] and reweighting training information. [130]

Deepfakes

Deepfakes (a portmanteau of “deep knowing” and “fake” [131] are AI-generated media that take an individual in an existing image or video and replace them with another person’s likeness using artificial neural networks. [132] Deepfakes have actually gathered extensive attention and issues for their uses in deepfake star pornographic videos, revenge porn, fake news, scams, health disinformation, financial scams, and concealed foreign election disturbance. [133] [134] [135] [136] [137] [138] [139] This has generated reactions from both industry and government to discover and limit their usage. [140] [141]

In July 2023, the fact-checking company Logically found that the popular generative AI designs Midjourney, DALL-E 2 and Stable Diffusion would produce plausible disinformation images when prompted to do so, such as pictures of electoral fraud in the United States and Muslim females supporting India’s Hindu nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party. [142] [143]

In April 2024, a paper proposed to use blockchain (distributed ledger technology) to promote “transparency, verifiability, and decentralization in AI advancement and usage”. [144]

Audio deepfakes

Instances of users abusing software application to generate questionable statements in the singing style of stars, public officials, and other popular individuals have raised ethical issues over voice generation AI. [145] [146] [147] [148] [149] [150] In action, companies such as ElevenLabs have stated that they would work on mitigating possible abuse through safeguards and identity verification. [151]

Concerns and fandoms have actually generated from AI-generated music. The same software application used to clone voices has actually been used on famous musicians’ voices to produce tunes that mimic their voices, acquiring both tremendous popularity and criticism. [152] [153] [154] Similar methods have actually also been used to create better quality or full-length versions of songs that have actually been dripped or have yet to be released. [155]

Generative AI has also been utilized to produce new digital artist characters, with a few of these getting sufficient attention to receive record offers at major labels. [156] The designers of these virtual artists have also faced their fair share of criticism for their personified programs, including backlash for “dehumanizing” an artform, and likewise developing artists which produce unrealistic or unethical appeals to their audiences. [157]

Cybercrime

Generative AI’s capability to develop sensible fake material has been made use of in various types of cybercrime, consisting of phishing scams. [158] Deepfake video and audio have actually been utilized to produce disinformation and scams. In 2020, previous Google click scams czar Shuman Ghosemajumder argued that once deepfake videos end up being perfectly practical, they would stop appearing remarkable to viewers, possibly causing uncritical acceptance of false details. [159] Additionally, large language designs and other kinds of text-generation AI have actually been used to produce fake reviews of e-commerce sites to increase ratings. [160] Cybercriminals have actually created big language designs focused on scams, including WormGPT and FraudGPT. [161]

A 2023 study showed that generative AI can be susceptible to jailbreaks, reverse psychology and prompt injection attacks, making it possible for attackers to get aid with harmful demands, such as for crafting social engineering and phishing attacks. [162] Additionally, other researchers have demonstrated that open-source designs can be fine-tuned to remove their safety constraints at low cost. [163]

Reliance on market giants

Training frontier AI designs requires a huge quantity of computing power. Usually only Big Tech companies have the financial resources to make such financial investments. Smaller start-ups such as Cohere and OpenAI wind up purchasing access to data centers from Google and Microsoft respectively. [164]

Energy and environment

Scientists and reporters have expressed concerns about the ecological impact that the advancement and release of generative designs are having: high CO2 emissions, [165] [166] [167] large amounts of freshwater used for data centers, [168] [169] and high amounts of electrical power use. [170] [166] [171] There is likewise concern that these impacts may increase as these models are included into extensively utilized search engines such as Google Search and Bing; [170] as chatbots and other applications become more popular; [170] [169] and as designs need to be retrained. [170]

Proposed mitigation strategies include factoring prospective ecological costs prior to model development or data collection, [165] increasing efficiency of data centers to lower electricity/energy usage, [168] [170] [166] [169] [171] [167] developing more effective machine finding out designs, [168] [166] [169] minimizing the number of times that designs need to be retrained, [167] developing a government-directed framework for auditing the ecological impact of these designs, [168] [167] managing for openness of these designs, [167] managing their energy and water use, [168] encouraging researchers to release data on their models’ carbon footprint, [170] [167] and increasing the variety of topic professionals who comprehend both device learning and environment science. [167]

Content quality

The New york city Times specifies slop as comparable to spam: “substandard or unwanted A.I. content in social networks, art, books and … in search results page.” [172] Journalists have actually revealed concerns about the scale of low-grade generated content with respect to social networks material small amounts, [173] the monetary rewards from social networks companies to spread such material, [173] [174] incorrect political messaging, [174] spamming of clinical term paper submissions, [175] increased effort and time to find higher quality or wanted material on the Internet, [176] the indexing of created material by search engines, [177] and on journalism itself. [178]

A paper published by scientists at Amazon Web Services AI Labs discovered that over 57% of sentences from a sample of over 6 billion sentences from Common Crawl, a snapshot of websites, were machine translated. Many of these automated translations were seen as lower quality, especially for sentences that were translated across a minimum of three languages. Many lower-resource languages (ex. Wolof, Xhosa) were translated throughout more languages than higher-resource languages (ex. English, French). [179] [180]

In September 2024, Robyn Speer, the author of wordfreq, an open source database that determined word frequencies based on text from the Internet, announced that she had actually stopped updating the data for numerous factors: high expenses for obtaining data from Reddit and Twitter, excessive focus on generative AI compared to other approaches in the natural language processing neighborhood, which “generative AI has polluted the data”. [181]

The adoption of generative AI tools resulted in a surge of AI-generated material across numerous domains. A research study from University College London approximated that in 2023, more than 60,000 academic articles-over 1% of all publications-were likely written with LLM support. [182] According to Stanford University’s Institute for Human-Centered AI, approximately 17.5% of newly published computer system science documents and 16.9% of peer evaluation text now include content generated by LLMs. [183]

Visual material follows a similar pattern. Since the launch of DALL-E 2 in 2022, it is estimated that approximately 34 million images have been created daily. Since August 2023, more than 15 billion images had been generated utilizing text-to-image algorithms, with 80% of these produced by designs based upon Stable Diffusion. [184]

If AI-generated content is included in brand-new data crawls from the Internet for extra training of AI models, defects in the resulting designs may take place. [185] Training an AI design solely on the output of another AI design produces a lower-quality model. Repeating this procedure, where each brand-new model is trained on the previous model’s output, results in progressive deterioration and ultimately results in a “design collapse” after multiple versions. [186] Tests have been carried out with pattern recognition of handwritten letters and with photos of human faces. [187] As a consequence, the value of information collected from genuine human interactions with systems may become increasingly important in the existence of LLM-generated content in information crawled from the Internet.

On the other side, synthetic data is frequently used as an option to information produced by real-world events. Such data can be released to verify mathematical models and to train artificial intelligence models while protecting user privacy, [188] including for structured data. [189] The approach is not restricted to text generation; image generation has been utilized to train computer system vision models. [190]

Misuse in journalism

In January 2023, Futurism.com broke the story that CNET had actually been utilizing a concealed internal AI tool to compose a minimum of 77 of its stories; after the news broke, CNET published corrections to 41 of the stories. [191]

In April 2023, the German tabloid Die Aktuelle released a fake AI-generated interview with previous racing chauffeur Michael Schumacher, who had not made any public looks since 2013 after sustaining a brain injury in a snowboarding mishap. The 2 possible disclosures: the cover consisted of the line “deceptively genuine”, and the interview consisted of a recommendation at the end that it was AI-generated. The editor-in-chief was fired soon thereafter in the middle of the controversy. [192]

Other outlets that have published short articles whose content and/or byline have actually been validated or thought to be created by generative AI models – frequently with false material, mistakes, and/or non-disclosure of generative AI usage – consist of:

– NewsBreak [193] [194]- outlets owned by Arena Group Sports Illustrated [195] TheStreet [195] Men’s Journal [196] The Columbus Dispatch [198] [199] Reviewed [200] USA Today [201] Gizmodo [205] Jalopnik [205] A.V. Club [205] [206] Quartz [207] Bankrate [209] Yoga Journal [201] Backpacker [201] Clean Eating [201] Miami Herald [201] Sacramento Bee [201] Tacoma News Tribune [201] The Rock Hill Herald [201] The Modesto Bee [201] Fort Worth Star-Telegram [201] Merced Sun-Star [201] Ledger-Enquirer [201] The Kansas City Star [201] Raleigh News & Observer [217] PC Magazine [201] Mashable [201] AskMen [201] Good Housekeeping [201] People [201] Parents [201] Food & Wine [201] InStyle [201] Real Simple [201] Travel + Leisure [201] Better Homes & Gardens [201] Southern Living [201] LA Weekly [218] The Village Voice [218]

In May 2024, Futurism noted that a content management system video by AdVon Commerce, who had actually used generative AI to produce short articles for a lot of the previously mentioned outlets, appeared to show that they “had produced tens of countless short articles for more than 150 publishers.” [201]

News broadcasters in Kuwait, Greece, South Korea, India, China and Taiwan have provided news with anchors based on Generative AI designs, triggering concerns about job losses for human anchors and audience trust in news that has actually historically been influenced by parasocial relationships with broadcasters, material creators or social networks influencers. [220] [221] [222] Algorithmically produced anchors have actually likewise been used by allies of ISIS for their broadcasts. [223]

In 2023, Google reportedly pitched a tool to news outlets that claimed to “produce newspaper article” based on input information supplied, such as “details of present occasions”. Some news business executives who viewed the pitch described it as” [taking] for given the effort that entered into producing precise and artistic newspaper article.” [224]

In February 2024, Google launched a program to pay little publishers to write three short articles daily using a beta generative AI design. The program does not need the understanding or consent of the websites that the publishers are utilizing as sources, nor does it need the released short articles to be identified as being produced or assisted by these designs. [225]

Many defunct news sites (The Hairpin, The Frisky, Apple Daily, Ashland Daily Tidings, Clayton County Register, Southwest Journal) and blogs (The Unofficial Apple Weblog, iLounge) have gone through cybersquatting, with short articles created by generative AI. [226] [227] [228] [229] [230] [231] [232] [233]

United States Senators Richard Blumenthal and Amy Klobuchar have actually expressed concern that generative AI might have a hazardous effect on local news. [234] In July 2023, OpenAI partnered with the American Journalism Project to fund regional news outlets for explore generative AI, with Axios keeping in mind the possibility of generative AI companies creating a reliance for these news outlets. [235]

Meta AI, a chatbot based on Llama 3 which sums up newspaper article, was kept in mind by The Washington Post to copy sentences from those stories without direct attribution and to potentially further reduce the traffic of online news outlets. [236]

In response to possible risks around the usage and misuse of generative AI in journalism and fret about decreasing audience trust, outlets around the globe, consisting of publications such as Wired, Associated Press, The Quint, Rappler or The Guardian have released standards around how they plan to utilize and not use AI and generative AI in their work. [237] [238] [239] [240]

In June 2024, Reuters Institute released their Digital New Report for 2024. In a study of people in America and Europe, Reuters Institute reports that 52% and 47% respectively are uncomfortable with news produced by “mainly AI with some human oversight”, and 23% and 15% respectively report being comfortable. 42% of Americans and 33% of Europeans reported that they were comfortable with news produced by “primarily human with some assistance from AI”. The outcomes of international surveys reported that individuals were more uncomfortable with news subjects consisting of politics (46%), crime (43%), and local news (37%) produced by AI than other news subjects. [241]

Computer shows website

Technology portal

Artificial general intelligence – Kind of AI with extensive capabilities
Artificial creativity – Artificial simulation of human creativity
Artificial intelligence art – Visual media created with AI
Artificial life – Field of study
Chatbot – Program that simulates conversation
Computational creativity – Multidisciplinary endeavour
Generative adversarial network – Deep learning approach
Generative pre-trained transformer – Type of big language design
Large language model – Type of artificial intelligence model
Music and synthetic intelligence – Usage of expert system to create music
Generative AI pornography – Explicit material produced by generative AI
Procedural generation – Method in which data is produced algorithmically instead of by hand
Retrieval-augmented generation – Type of information retrieval utilizing LLMs
Stochastic parrot – Term utilized in artificial intelligence

References

^ Newsom, Gavin; Weber, Shirley N. (September 5, 2023). “Executive Order N-12-23” (PDF). Executive Department, State of California. Archived (PDF) from the original on February 21, 2024. Retrieved September 7, 2023.
^ Pinaya, Walter H. L.; Graham, Mark S.; Kerfoot, Eric; Tudosiu, Petru-Daniel; Dafflon, Jessica; Fernandez, Virginia; Sanchez, Pedro; Wolleb, Julia; da Costa, Pedro F.; Patel, Ashay (2023 ). “Generative AI for Medical Imaging: extending the MONAI Framework”. arXiv:2307.15208 [eess.IV] ^ “What is ChatGPT, DALL-E, and generative AI?”. McKinsey. Retrieved December 14, 2024.
^ “What is generative AI?”. IBM. March 22, 2024.
^ Pasick, Adam (March 27, 2023). “Expert System Glossary: Neural Networks and Other Terms Explained”. The New York City Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the initial on September 1, 2023. Retrieved April 22, 2023.
^ Karpathy, Andrej; Abbeel, Pieter; Brockman, Greg; Chen, Peter; Cheung, Vicki; Duan, Yan; Goodfellow, Ian; Kingma, Durk; Ho, Jonathan; Rein Houthooft; Tim Salimans; John Schulman; Ilya Sutskever; Wojciech Zaremba (June 16, 2016). “Generative models”. OpenAI. Archived from the initial on November 17, 2023. Retrieved March 15, 2023.
^ a b Griffith, Erin; Metz, Cade (January 27, 2023). “Anthropic Said to Be Closing In on $300 Million in New A.I. Funding”. The New York Times. Archived from the original on December 9, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2023.
^ Lanxon, Nate; Bass, Dina; Davalos, Jackie (March 10, 2023). “A Cheat Sheet to AI Buzzwords and Their Meanings”. Bloomberg News. Archived from the original on November 17, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2023.
^ Metz, Cade (March 14, 2023). “OpenAI Plans to Up the Ante in Tech’s A.I. Race”. The New York City Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the initial on March 31, 2023. Retrieved March 31, 2023.
^ Thoppilan, Romal; De Freitas, Daniel; Hall, Jamie; Shazeer, Noam; Kulshreshtha, Apoorv (January 20, 2022). “LaMDA: Language Models for Dialog Applications”. arXiv:2201.08239 [cs.CL] ^ Roose, Kevin (October 21, 2022). “A Coming-Out Party for Generative A.I., Silicon Valley’s New Craze”. The New York Times. Archived from the initial on February 15, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2023.
^ a b Metz, Cade (February 15, 2024). “OpenAI Unveils A.I. That Instantly Generates Eye-Popping Videos”. The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on February 15, 2024. Retrieved February 16, 2024.
^ “The race of the AI labs warms up”. The Economist. January 30, 2023. Archived from the original on November 17, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2023.
^ Yang, June; Gokturk, Burak (March 14, 2023). “Google Cloud brings generative AI to designers, businesses, and federal governments”. Archived from the original on November 17, 2023. Retrieved March 15, 2023.
^ Brynjolfsson, Erik; Li, Danielle; Raymond, Lindsey R. (April 2023), Generative AI at Work (Working Paper), Working Paper Series, doi:10.3386/ w31161, archived from the original on March 28, 2024, recovered January 21, 2024
^ “Don’t fear an AI-induced tasks apocalypse just yet”. The Economist. March 6, 2023. Archived from the initial on November 17, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2023.
^ Coyle, Jake (September 27, 2023). “In Hollywood authors’ battle against AI, humans win (for now)”. AP News. Associated Press. Archived from the original on April 3, 2024. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
^ Harreis, H.; Koullias, T.; Roberts, Roger. “Generative AI: Unlocking the future of fashion”. Archived from the original on November 17, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2023.
^ “How Generative AI Can Augment Human Creativity”. Harvard Business Review. June 16, 2023. ISSN 0017-8012. Archived from the original on June 20, 2023. Retrieved June 20, 2023.
^ Hendrix, Justin (May 16, 2023). “Transcript: Senate Judiciary Subcommittee Hearing on Oversight of AI”. techpolicy.press. Archived from the initial on November 17, 2023. Retrieved May 19, 2023.
^ Simon, Felix M.; Altay, Sacha; Mercier, Hugo (October 18, 2023). “Misinformation reloaded? Fears about the impact of generative AI on false information are overblown”. Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review. doi:10.37016/ mr-2020-127. S2CID 264113883. Archived from the initial on November 17, 2023. Retrieved November 16, 2023.
^ “New AI systems hit copyright law”. BBC News. August 1, 2023. Retrieved September 28, 2024.
^ Newquist, H. P. (1994 ). The Brain Makers: Genius, Ego, And Greed In The Quest For Machines That Think. New York City: Macmillan/SAMS. pp. 45-53. ISBN 978-0-672-30412-5.
^ Sharkey, Noel (July 4, 2007), A programmable robotic from 60 AD, vol. 2611, New Scientist, archived from the initial on January 13, 2018, recovered October 22, 2019
^ Brett, Gerard (July 1954), “The Automata in the Byzantine “Throne of Solomon””, Speculum, 29 (3 ): 477-487, doi:10.2307/ 2846790, ISSN 0038-7134, JSTOR 2846790, S2CID 163031682.
^ kelinich (March 8, 2014). “Maillardet’s Automaton”. The Franklin Institute. Archived from the original on August 24, 2023. Retrieved August 24, 2023.
^ Grinstead, Charles Miller; Snell, James Laurie (1997 ). Introduction to Probability. American Mathematical Society. pp. 464-466. ISBN 978-0-8218-0749-1.
^ Bremaud, Pierre (March 9, 2013). Markov Chains: Gibbs Fields, Monte Carlo Simulation, and Queues. Springer Science & Business Media. p. ix. ISBN 978-1-4757-3124-8. Archived from the initial on March 23, 2017.
^ Hayes, Brian (2013 ). “First Links in the Markov Chain”. American Scientist. 101 (2 ): 92. doi:10.1511/ 2013.101.92. ISSN 0003-0996. Archived from the initial on May 7, 2024. Retrieved September 24, 2023.
^ Fine, Shai; Singer, Yoram; Tishby, Naftali (July 1, 1998). “The Hierarchical Hidden Markov Model: Analysis and Applications”. Artificial intelligence. 32 (1 ): 41-62. doi:10.1023/ A:1007469218079. ISSN 1573-0565. S2CID 3465810.
^ Crevier, Daniel (1993 ). AI: The Tumultuous Look For Expert System. New York City, New York City: BasicBooks. p. 109. ISBN 0-465-02997-3.
^ Bergen, Nathan; Huang, Angela (2023 ). “A Quick History of Generative AI” (PDF). Dichotomies: Generative AI: Navigating Towards a Much Better Future (2 ): 4. Archived (PDF) from the original on August 10, 2023. Retrieved August 8, 2023.
^ a b Alting, Leo; Zhang, Hongchao (1989 ). “Computer assisted procedure preparation: the advanced survey”. The International Journal of Production Research. 27 (4 ): 553-585. doi:10.1080/ 00207548908942569. Archived from the original on May 7, 2024. Retrieved October 3, 2023.
^ Chien, Steve (1998 ). “Automated planning and scheduling for goal-based self-governing spacecraft”. IEEE Intelligent Systems and Their Applications. 13 (5 ): 50-55. doi:10.1109/ 5254.722362.
^ Burstein, Mark H., ed. (1994 ). ARPA/Rome Laboratory Knowledge-based Planning and Scheduling Initiative Workshop Proceedings. The Advanced Research Projects Agency, Department of Defense, and Rome Laboratory, US Air Force, Griffiss AFB. p. 219. ISBN 155860345X.
^ Pell, Barney; Bernard, Douglas E.; Chien, Steve A.; Gat, Erann; Muscettola, Nicola; Nayak, P. Pandurang; Wagner, Michael D.; Williams, Brian C. (1998 ). Bekey, George A. (ed.). A Self-governing Spacecraft Agent Prototype. Autonomous Robots Volume 5, No. 1. pp. 29-45. Our deliberator is a conventional generative AI organizer based upon the HSTS planning structure (Muscettola, 1994), and our control component is a traditional spacecraft attitude control system (Hackney et al. 1993). We also include an architectural component explicitly devoted to world modeling (the mode identifier), and compare control and tracking.
^ Jebara, Tony (2012 ). Artificial intelligence: discriminative and generative. Vol. 755. Springer Science & Business Media.
^ Cao, Yihan; Li, Siyu; Liu, Yixin; Yan, Zhiling; Dai, Yutong; Yu, Philip S.; Sun, Lichao (March 7, 2023). “A Detailed Survey of AI-Generated Content (AIGC): A History of Generative AI from GAN to ChatGPT”. arXiv:2303.04226 [cs.AI] ^ “finetune-transformer-lm”. GitHub. Archived from the initial on May 19, 2023. Retrieved May 19, 2023.
^ Radford, Alec; Wu, Jeffrey; Child, Rewon; Luan, David; Amodei, Dario; Sutskever, Ilya (2019 ). “Language models are without supervision multitask students” (PDF). OpenAI Blog.
^ Radford, Alec (June 11, 2018). “Improving language comprehending with not being watched learning”. OpenAI. Retrieved October 6, 2024.
^ Chandraseta, Rionaldi (January 21, 2021). “Generate Your Favourite Characters’ Voice Lines using Artificial intelligence”. Towards Data Science. Retrieved December 18, 2024.
^ Temitope, Yusuf (December 10, 2024). “15. ai Creator reveals journey from MIT Project to internet phenomenon”. The Guardian. Archived from the initial on December 28, 2024. Retrieved December 25, 2024.
^ Anirudh VK (March 18, 2023). “Deepfakes Are Elevating Meme Culture, But At What Cost?”. Analytics India Magazine. Archived from the original on December 26, 2024. Retrieved December 18, 2024. While AI voice memes have actually been around in some type considering that ’15. ai’ launched in 2020, […] ^ Coldewey, Devin (January 5, 2021). “OpenAI’s DALL-E produces plausible pictures of actually anything you ask it to”. TechCrunch. Retrieved March 15, 2023.
^ “Stable Diffusion Public Release”. Stability AI. Retrieved March 15, 2023.
^ Lock, Samantha (December 5, 2022). “What is AI chatbot phenomenon ChatGPT and could it replace people?”. The Guardian. Retrieved March 15, 2023.
^ Huang, Haomiao (August 23, 2023). “How ChatGPT turned generative AI into an “anything tool””. Ars Technica. Retrieved September 21, 2024.
^ Bubeck, Sébastien; Chandrasekaran, Varun; Eldan, Ronen; Gehrke, Johannes; Horvitz, Eric; Kamar, Ece; Lee, Peter; Lee, Yin Tat; Li, Yuanzhi; Lundberg, Scott; Nori, Harsha; Palangi, Hamid; Ribeiro, Marco Tulio; Zhang, Yi (March 22, 2023). “Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early try outs GPT-4”. arXiv:2303.12712 [cs.CL] ^ Schlagwein, Daniel; Willcocks, Leslie (September 13, 2023). “ChatGPT et al: The Ethics of Using (Generative) Expert System in Research and Science”. Journal of Information Technology. 38 (2 ): 232-238. doi:10.1177/ 02683962231200411. S2CID 261753752.
^ “Meta open-sources multisensory AI design that combines six kinds of information”. May 9, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2024.
^ Kruppa, Miles (December 6, 2023). “Google Announces AI System Gemini After Turmoil at Rival OpenAI”. The Wall Street Journal. ISSN 0099-9660. Archived from the initial on December 6, 2023. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Edwards, Benj (December 6, 2023). “Google releases Gemini-a powerful AI design it says can surpass GPT-4”. Ars Technica. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Metz, Cade (February 8, 2024). “Google Releases Gemini, an A.I.-Driven Chatbot and Voice Assistant”. The New York City Times. Retrieved February 8, 2024.
^ “Introducing the next generation of Claude”. Retrieved March 4, 2024.
^ Nuñez, Michael (March 4, 2024). “Anthropic unveils Claude 3, surpassing GPT-4 and Gemini Ultra in benchmark tests”. Venture Beat. Retrieved April 9, 2024.
^ Pierce, David (June 20, 2024). “Anthropic has a quick brand-new AI design – and a creative new way to interact with chatbots”. The Verge. Retrieved June 22, 2024.
^ Baptista, Eduardo (July 9, 2024). “China leads the world in adoption of generative AI, survey programs”. Reuters. Retrieved July 14, 2024.
^ “A History of Generative AI: From GAN to GPT-4”. March 21, 2023. Archived from the initial on June 10, 2023. Retrieved April 28, 2023.
^ “Explainer: What is Generative AI, the innovation behind OpenAI’s ChatGPT?”. Reuters. March 17, 2023. Archived from the initial on March 30, 2023. Retrieved March 17, 2023.
^ Roose, Kevin (February 16, 2023). “Bing’s A.I. Chat: ‘I Wished to Be Alive.'”. The New York City Times. Archived from the initial on April 15, 2023. Retrieved January 30, 2024.
^ Bommasani, R.; Hudson, D. A.; Adeli, E.; Altman, R.; Arora, S.; von Arx, S.; Bernstein, M. S.; Bohg, J.; Bosselut, A; Brunskill, E.; Brynjolfsson, E. (August 16, 2021). “On the opportunities and risks of foundation models”. arXiv:2108.07258 [cs.LG] ^ Chen, Ming; Tworek, Jakub; Jun, Hongyu; Yuan, Qinyuan; Pinto, Hanyu Philippe De Oliveira; Kaplan, Jerry; Edwards, Haley; Burda, Yannick; Joseph, Nicholas; Brockman, Greg; Ray, Alvin (July 6, 2021). “Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Code”. arXiv:2107.03374 [cs.LG] ^ “Investing in Cursor”. Andreesen Horowitz.
^ Epstein, Ziv; Hertzmann, Aaron; Akten, Memo; Farid, Hany; Fjeld, Jessica; Frank, Morgan R. ; Groh, Matthew; Herman, Laura; Leach, Neil; Mahari, Robert; Pentland, Alex “Sandy”; Russakovsky, Olga; Schroeder, Hope; Smith, Amy (2023 ). “Art and the science of generative AI“. Science. 380 (6650 ): 1110-1111. arXiv:2306.04141. Bibcode:2023 Sci … 380.1110 E. doi:10.1126/ science.adh4451. PMID 37319193. S2CID 259095707.
^ Ramesh, Aditya; Pavlov, Mikhail; Goh, Gabriel; Gray, Scott; Voss, Chelsea; Radford, Alec; Chen, Mark; Sutskever, Ilya (2021 ). “Zero-shot text-to-image generation”. International Conference on Machine Learning. PMLR. pp. 8821-8831.
^ Chandraseta, Rionaldi (January 21, 2021). “Generate Your Favourite Characters’ Voice Lines using Artificial intelligence”. Towards Data Science. Archived from the original on January 21, 2021. Retrieved December 18, 2024.
^ Temitope, Yusuf (December 10, 2024). “15. ai Creator reveals journey from MIT Project to internet phenomenon”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on December 28, 2024. Retrieved December 25, 2024.
^ Ruppert, Liana (January 18, 2021). “Make Portal’s GLaDOS And Other Beloved Characters Say The Weirdest Things With This App”. Game Informer. Archived from the original on January 18, 2021. Retrieved December 18, 2024.
^ Kurosawa, Yuki (January 19, 2021). “ゲームキャラ音声読み上げソフト 15. ai 公開中 。 Undertale や Portal のキャラに好きなセリフを言ってもらえる” [Game Character Voice Reading Software “15. ai” Now Available. Get Characters from Undertale and Portal to Say Your Desired Lines] AUTOMATON (in Japanese). Archived from the initial on January 19, 2021. Retrieved December 18, 2024. 英語版ボイスのみなので注意 。; もうひとつ15.aiの大きな特徴として挙げられるのが 、 豊かな感情表現だ 。 [Please note that only English voices are available.; Another significant function of 15. ai is its abundant psychological expression.] ^ Desai, Saahil (July 17, 2023). “A Voicebot Just Left Me Speechless”. The Atlantic. Archived from the original on December 8, 2023. Retrieved November 28, 2023.
^ Agostinelli, Andrea; Denk, Timo I.; Borsos, Zalán; Engel, Jesse; Verzetti, Mauro; Caillon, Antoine; Huang, Qingqing; Jansen, Aren; Roberts, Adam; Tagliasacchi, Marco; Sharifi, Matt; Zeghidour, Neil; Frank, Christian (January 26, 2023). “MusicLM: Generating Music From Text”. arXiv:2301.11325 [cs.SD] ^ Dalugdug, Mandy (August 3, 2023). “Meta in June stated that it utilized 20,000 hours of licensed music to train MusicGen, that included 10,000 “top quality” certified music tracks. At the time, Meta’s researchers detailed in a paper the ethical challenges that they encountered around the development of generative AI designs like MusicGen”. Archived from the original on August 15, 2023.
^ “Jay-Z’s Delaware manufacturer stimulates dispute over AI rights”. Archived from the original on February 27, 2024. Retrieved February 27, 2024.
^ “10 “Best” AI Music Generators (April 2024) – Unite.AI”. October 19, 2022. Archived from the original on January 29, 2024. Retrieved February 27, 2024.
^ Metz, Cade (April 4, 2023). “Instant Videos Could Represent the Next Leap in A.I. Technology”. The New York City Times. Archived from the initial on April 5, 2023. Retrieved April 5, 2023.
^ Wong, Queenie (September 29, 2022). “Facebook Parent Meta’s AI Tool Can Create Artsy Videos From Text”. cnet.com. Archived from the initial on April 5, 2023. Retrieved April 4, 2023.
^ Yang, Sherry; Du, Yilun (April 12, 2023). “UniPi: Learning universal policies through text-guided video generation”. Google Research, Brain Team. Google AI Blog. Archived from the original on May 24, 2023.
^ Brohan, Anthony (2023 ). “RT-2: Vision-Language-Action Models Transfer Web Knowledge to Robotic Control”. arXiv:2307.15818 [cs.RO] ^ Abdullahi, Aminu (November 17, 2023). “10 Best Artificial Intelligence (AI) 3D Generators”. eWEEK. Archived from the initial on May 7, 2024. Retrieved February 6, 2024.
^ “Slash CAD design construct times with new AI-driven part development methodology|GlobalSpec”. Archived from the initial on January 23, 2024. Retrieved February 6, 2024.
^ “The Role of Expert System (AI) in the CAD Industry”. March 22, 2023. Archived from the original on February 9, 2024. Retrieved February 6, 2024.
^ Sabin, Sam (June 30, 2023). “GitHub has a vision to make code more protected by design”. Axios Codebook. Archived from the initial on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023.
^ Vincent, James (March 20, 2023). “Text-to-video AI inches more detailed as startup Runway reveals brand-new model”. The Verge. Archived from the initial on September 27, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. Text-to-video is the next frontier for generative AI, though current output is fundamental. Runway says it’ll be making its new generative video model, Gen-2, readily available to users in ‘the coming weeks.’
^ Vanian, Jonathan (March 16, 2023). “Microsoft includes OpenAI innovation to Word and Excel”. CNBC. Archived from the original on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. Microsoft is bringing generative expert system technologies such as the popular ChatGPT chatting app to its Microsoft 365 suite of service software application … the new A.I. features, dubbed Copilot, will be readily available in some of the company’s most popular company apps, including Word, PowerPoint and Excel.
^ Wilson, Mark (August 15, 2023). “The app’s Memories feature simply got a huge upgrade”. TechRadar. Archived from the initial on August 15, 2023. The Google Photos app is getting a redesigned, AI-powered Memories feature … you’ll have the ability to utilize generative AI to come up with some recommended names like “a desert experience”.
^ Sullivan, Laurie (May 23, 2023). “Adobe Adds Generative AI To Photoshop”. MediaPost. Archived from the initial on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. Generative artificial intelligence (AI) will end up being one of the most essential features for imaginative designers and marketers. Adobe on Tuesday revealed a Generative Fill feature in Photoshop to bring Firefly’s AI abilities into design.
^ Michael Nuñez (July 19, 2023). “LLaMA 2: How to gain access to and usage Meta’s versatile open-source chatbot right now”. VentureBeat. Archived from the original on November 3, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. If you wish to run LLaMA 2 on your own maker or modify the code, you can download it straight from Hugging Face, a leading platform for sharing AI models.
^ Pounder, Les (March 25, 2023). “How To Create Your Own AI Chatbot Server With Raspberry Pi 4”. Archived from the initial on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. Using a Pi 4 with 8GB of RAM, you can develop a ChatGPT-like server based upon LLaMA.
^ Kemper, Jonathan (November 10, 2022). “”Draw Things” App brings Stable Diffusion to the iPhone”. The Decoder. Archived from the original on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. Draw Things is an app that brings Stable Diffusion to the iPhone. The AI images are generated locally, so you don’t need a Web connection.
^ Witt, Allan (July 7, 2023). “Best Computer to Run LLaMA AI Model in your home (GPU, CPU, RAM, SSD)”. Archived from the initial on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. To run LLaMA design in your home, you will require a computer build with a powerful GPU that can manage the big amount of information and calculation needed for inferencing.
^ Westover, Brian (September 28, 2023). “Who Needs ChatGPT? How to Run Your Own Free and Private AI Chatbot”. Ziff Davis. Archived from the original on January 7, 2024. Retrieved January 7, 2024.
^ @karpathy (December 20, 2023). “I basically only trust two LLM evals today” (Tweet) – by means of Twitter.
^ @ylecun (January 5, 2024). “Nabla’s shift from ChatGPT to open source LLMs …” (Tweet) – by means of Twitter.
^ @ylecun (November 1, 2023). “Open source platforms * increase * security and security” (Tweet) – via Twitter.
^ Nellis, Stephen; Lee, Jane (September 1, 2022). “U.S. officials order Nvidia to stop sales of top AI chips to China”. Reuters. Archived from the initial on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023.
^ Shilov, Anton (May 7, 2023). “Nvidia’s Chinese A800 GPU’s Performance Revealed”. Tom’s Hardware. Archived from the original on May 7, 2024. Retrieved August 15, 2023. the A800 operates at 70% of the speed of A100 GPUs while adhering to strict U.S. export standards that restrict just how much processing power Nvidia can sell.
^ Patel, Dylan (October 24, 2022). “How China’s Biren Is Attempting To Evade US Sanctions”. Archived from the original on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023.
^ “5 free software to recognise fake AI-generated images” (in Italian). October 28, 2023. Archived from the original on October 29, 2023. Retrieved October 29, 2023.
^ “Detecting AI fingerprints: A guide to watermarking and beyond”. Brookings Institution. January 4, 2024. Archived from the initial on September 3, 2024. Retrieved September 5, 2024.
^ Fowler, Geoffrey (April 3, 2023). “We checked a new ChatGPT-detector for teachers. It flagged an innocent student”. washingtonpost.com. Archived from the initial on March 28, 2024. Retrieved February 6, 2024.
^ Fowler, Geoffrey (June 2, 2023). “Detecting AI may be impossible. That’s a huge problem for teachers”. washingtonpost.com. Archived from the initial on June 3, 2023. Retrieved February 6, 2024.
^ Bartz, Diane; Hu, Krystal (July 21, 2023). “OpenAI, Google, others promise to watermark AI content for security, White House says”. Reuters. Archived from the original on July 27, 2023.
^ “FACT SHEET: President Biden Issues Executive Order on Safe, Secure, and Trustworthy Expert System”. The White House. October 30, 2023. Archived from the initial on January 30, 2024. Retrieved January 30, 2024.
^ Burt, Andrew (October 31, 2023). “3 Obstacles to Regulating Generative AI”. Harvard Business Review. ISSN 0017-8012. Archived from the initial on February 17, 2024. Retrieved February 17, 2024.
^ “EU AI Act: very first policy on synthetic intelligence”. European Parliament. August 6, 2023. Retrieved September 13, 2024.
^ Chee, Foo Yun; Mukherjee, Supantha (June 14, 2023). “EU lawmakers elect tougher AI guidelines as draft relocate to last”. Reuters. Archived from the initial on July 27, 2023. Retrieved July 26, 2023.
^ Ye, Josh (July 13, 2023). “China states generative AI rules to apply just to products for the public”. Reuters. Archived from the initial on July 27, 2023. Retrieved July 13, 2023.
^ “生成式人工智能服务管理暂行办法”. July 13, 2023. Archived from the initial on July 27, 2023. Retrieved July 27, 2023.
^ a b “Generative Expert system and Copyright Law”. Congressional Research Service. LSB10922. September 29, 2023. Archived from the initial on March 22, 2024. Retrieved January 30, 2024.
^ Thompson, Stuart (January 25, 2024). “We Asked A.I. to Create the Joker. It Generated a Copyrighted Image”. The New York City Times. Archived from the initial on January 25, 2024. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
^ Hadero, Haleluya; Bauder, David (December 27, 2023). “The New york city Times takes legal action against OpenAI and Microsoft for utilizing its stories to train chatbots”. Associated Press News. AP News. Archived from the initial on December 27, 2023. Retrieved April 13, 2023.
^ O’Brien, Matt (September 25, 2023). “Photo huge Getty took a leading AI image-maker to court. Now it’s likewise embracing the innovation”. AP NEWS. Associated Press. Archived from the original on January 30, 2024. Retrieved January 30, 2024.
^ Barber, Gregory (December 9, 2023). “The Generative AI Copyright Fight Is Just Starting”. Wired. Archived from the original on January 19, 2024. Retrieved January 19, 2024.
^ Bruell, Alexandra (December 27, 2023). “New York Times Sues Microsoft and OpenAI, Alleging Copyright Infringement”. Wall Street Journal. Archived from the initial on January 18, 2024. Retrieved January 19, 2024.
^ Brittain, Blake (August 21, 2023). “AI-generated art can not receive copyrights, US court says”. Reuters. Archived from the original on January 20, 2024. Retrieved January 19, 2024.
^ David, Emilla (August 29, 2023). “US Copyright Office desires to hear what individuals think of AI and copyright”. The Verge. Archived from the initial on January 19, 2024. Retrieved January 19, 2024.
^ “Secretary-General’s remarks to the Security Council on Artificial Intelligence”. un.org. July 18, 2023. Archived from the original on July 28, 2023. Retrieved July 27, 2023.
^ “The Writers Strike Is Deciding on AI“. Time. May 4, 2023. Archived from the original on June 11, 2023. Retrieved June 11, 2023.
^ Tarnoff, Ben (August 4, 2023). “Lessons from Eliza”. The Guardian Weekly. pp. 34-39.
^ Zhou, Viola (April 11, 2023). “AI is already taking computer game illustrators’ tasks in China”. Rest of World. Archived from the initial on August 13, 2023. Retrieved August 17, 2023.
^ Carter, Justin (April 11, 2023). “China’s game art industry supposedly decimated by growing AI use”. Game Developer. Archived from the original on August 17, 2023. Retrieved August 17, 2023.
^ Collier, Kevin (July 14, 2023). “Actors vs. AI: Strike brings focus to emerging use of advanced tech”. NBC News. Archived from the initial on July 20, 2023. Retrieved July 21, 2023. SAG-AFTRA has signed up with the Writer’s [sic] Guild of America in demanding an agreement that clearly demands AI regulations to secure authors and the works they create. … The future of generative artificial intelligence in Hollywood-and how it can be utilized to change labor-has end up being an essential sticking point for stars going on strike. In a press conference Thursday, Fran Drescher, president of the Screen Actors Guild-American Federation of Television and Radio Artists (more frequently known as SAG-AFTRA), stated that ‘synthetic intelligence poses an existential danger to imaginative occupations, and all actors and entertainers are worthy of agreement language that safeguards them from having their identity and skill made use of without permission and pay.’
^ Wiggers, Kyle (August 22, 2023). “ElevenLabs’ voice-generating tools introduce out of beta”. TechCrunch. Archived from the initial on November 28, 2023. Retrieved September 25, 2023.
^ Shrivastava, Rashi. “‘Keep Your Paws Off My Voice’: Voice Actors Worry Generative AI Will Steal Their Livelihoods”. Forbes. Archived from the original on December 2, 2023. Retrieved November 28, 2023.
^ Gupta, Shalene (October 31, 2023). “Underrepresented groups in countries around the world are fretted about AI being a threat to tasks”. Fast Company. Archived from the original on December 8, 2023. Retrieved December 8, 2023.
^ Rachel Gordon (March 3, 2023). “Large language models are biased. Can logic assist in saving them?”. MIT CSAIL. Archived from the original on January 23, 2024. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
^ OpenAI (July 18, 2022). “Reducing predisposition and enhancing safety in DALL · E 2”. OpenAI. Archived from the original on January 26, 2024. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
^ Jake Traylor (July 27, 2022). “No fast fix: How OpenAI’s DALL · E 2 showed the obstacles of predisposition in AI”. NBC News. Archived from the initial on January 26, 2024. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
^ “DALL · E 2 pre-training mitigations”. OpenAI. June 28, 2022. Archived from the initial on January 26, 2024. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
^ Brandon, John (February 16, 2018). “Terrifying high-tech porn: Creepy ‘deepfake’ videos are on the increase”. Fox News. Archived from the initial on June 15, 2018. Retrieved February 20, 2018.
^ Cole, Samantha (January 24, 2018). “We Are Truly Fucked: Everyone Is Making AI-Generated Fake Porn Now”. Vice. Archived from the original on September 7, 2019. Retrieved May 4, 2019.
^ “What Are Deepfakes & Why the Future of Porn is Terrifying”. Highsnobiety. February 20, 2018. Archived from the original on July 14, 2021. Retrieved February 20, 2018.
^ “Experts fear face swapping tech could start a global face-off”. The Outline. Archived from the initial on January 16, 2020. Retrieved February 28, 2018.
^ Roose, Kevin (March 4, 2018). “Here Come the Fake Videos, Too”. The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the initial on June 18, 2019. Retrieved March 24, 2018.
^ Schreyer, Marco; Sattarov, Timur; Reimer, Bernd; Borth, Damian (2019 ). “Adversarial Learning of Deepfakes in Accounting”. arXiv:1910.03810 [cs.LG] ^ Menz, Bradley (2024 ). “Health Disinformation Use Case Highlighting the Urgent Need for Expert System Vigilance”. JAMA Internal Medicine. 184 (1 ): 92-96. doi:10.1001/ jamainternmed.2023.5947. PMID 37955873. S2CID 265148637. Archived from the initial on February 4, 2024. Retrieved February 4, 2024.
^ Chalfant, Morgan (March 6, 2024). “U.S. braces for foreign interference in 2024 election”. Semafor. Archived from the original on March 11, 2024. Retrieved March 6, 2024.
^ Menn, Joseph (September 23, 2024). “Russia, Iran utilize AI to enhance anti-U.S. influence projects, authorities state”. The Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Archived from the original on September 24, 2024. Retrieved September 23, 2024.
^ “Join the Deepfake Detection Challenge (DFDC)”. deepfakedetectionchallenge.ai. Archived from the original on January 12, 2020. Retrieved November 8, 2019.
^ Clarke, Yvette D. (June 28, 2019). “H.R. 3230 – 116th Congress (2019-2020): Defending Each and Every Person from False Appearances by Keeping Exploitation Subject to Accountability Act of 2019”. www.congress.gov. Archived from the initial on December 17, 2019. Retrieved October 16, 2019.
^ “New Research Reveals Scale of Threat Posed by AI-generated Images on 2024 Elections”. Logically. July 27, 2023. Archived from the original on October 3, 2023. Retrieved July 6, 2024.
^ Lawton, Graham (September 12, 2023). “Disinformation wars: The battle against phony news in the age of AI”. New Scientist. Retrieved July 5, 2024.
^ Brewer, Jordan; Patel, Dhru; Kim, Dennie; Murray, Alex (April 12, 2024). “Navigating the obstacles of generative innovations: Proposing the combination of artificial intelligence and blockchain”. Business Horizons. 67 (5 ): 525-535. doi:10.1016/ j.bushor.2024.04.011. ISSN 0007-6813.
^ “People Are Still Terrible: AI Voice-Cloning Tool Misused for Deepfake Celeb Clips”. PCMag Middle East. January 31, 2023. Archived from the original on December 25, 2023. Retrieved July 25, 2023.
^ “The generative A.I. software application race has started”. Fortune. Archived from the initial on March 25, 2023. Retrieved February 3, 2023.
^ Milmo, Dan; Hern, Alex (May 20, 2023). “Elections in UK and US at risk from AI-driven disinformation, state experts”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on November 16, 2023. Retrieved July 25, 2023.
^ “Seeing is thinking? Global scramble to deal with deepfakes”. news.yahoo.com. Archived from the initial on February 3, 2023. Retrieved February 3, 2023.
^ Vincent, James (January 31, 2023). “4chan users welcome AI voice clone tool to generate celeb hatespeech”. The Verge. Archived from the original on December 3, 2023. Retrieved February 3, 2023.
^ Thompson, Stuart A. (March 12, 2023). “Making Deepfakes Gets Cheaper and Easier Thanks to A.I.” The New York City Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the initial on October 29, 2023. Retrieved July 25, 2023.
^ “A new AI voice tool is already being abused to make deepfake star audio clips”. Engadget. January 31, 2023. Archived from the original on October 10, 2023. Retrieved February 3, 2023.
^ Gee, Andre (April 20, 2023). “Even If AI-Generated Rap Songs Go Viral Doesn’t Mean They’re Good”. Rolling Stone. Archived from the original on January 2, 2024. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Coscarelli, Joe (April 19, 2023). “An A.I. Hit of Fake ‘Drake’ and ‘The Weeknd’ Rattles the Music World”. The New York Times. Archived from the original on May 15, 2023. Retrieved December 5, 2023.
^ Lippiello, Emily; Smith, Nathan; Pereira, Ivan (November 3, 2023). “AI tunes that simulate popular artists raising alarms in the music market”. ABC News. Archived from the initial on December 6, 2023. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Skelton, Eric. “Fans Are Using Artificial Intelligence to Turn Rap Snippets Into Full Songs”. Complex. Archived from the original on January 2, 2024. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Marr, Bernard. “Virtual Influencer Noonoouri Lands Record Deal: Is She The Future Of Music?”. Forbes. Archived from the original on December 4, 2023. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Thaler, Shannon (September 8, 2023). “Warner Music indications first-ever record handle AI pop star”. New York Post. Archived from the original on December 15, 2023. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Sjouwerman, Stu (December 26, 2022). “Deepfakes: Prepare for phishing 2.0”. Fast Company. Archived from the initial on July 31, 2023. Retrieved July 31, 2023.
^ Sonnemaker, Tyler. “As social media platforms brace for the incoming wave of deepfakes, Google’s previous ‘fraud czar’ forecasts the biggest threat is that deepfakes will eventually end up being uninteresting”. Business Insider. Archived from the original on April 14, 2021. Retrieved July 31, 2023.
^ Collinson, Patrick (July 15, 2023). “Fake reviews: can we trust what we read online as use of AI explodes?”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on November 22, 2023. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ “After WormGPT, FraudGPT Emerges to Help Scammers Steal Your Data”. PCMAG. July 25, 2023. Archived from the original on July 31, 2023. Retrieved July 31, 2023.
^ Gupta, Maanak; Akiri, Charankumar; Aryal, Kshitiz; Parker, Eli; Praharaj, Lopamudra (2023 ). “From ChatGPT to ThreatGPT: Impact of Generative AI in Cybersecurity and Privacy”. IEEE Access. 11: 80218-80245. arXiv:2307.00691. Bibcode:2023 IEEEA..1180218 G. doi:10.1109/ ACCESS.2023.3300381. S2CID 259316122.
^ Piper, Kelsey (February 2, 2024). “Should we make our most powerful AI designs open source to all?”. Vox. Retrieved January 13, 2025.
^ Metz, Cade (July 10, 2023). “In the Age of A.I., Tech’s Little Guys Need Big Friends”. New York Times.
^ a b Bender, Emily M.; Gebru, Timnit; McMillan-Major, Angelina; Shmitchell, Shmargaret (March 1, 2021). “On the Dangers of Stochastic Parrots: Can Language Models be Too Big?”. Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency. FAccT ’21. New York City, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery. pp. 610-623. doi:10.1145/ 3442188.3445922. ISBN 978-1-4503-8309-7.
^ a b c d “AI is an energy hog. This is what it indicates for climate modification”. MIT Technology Review. May 23, 2024. Archived from the initial on August 20, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ a b c d e f g Dhar, Payal (August 1, 2020). “The carbon impact of synthetic intelligence”. Nature Machine Intelligence. 2 (8 ): 423-425. doi:10.1038/ s42256-020-0219-9. ISSN 2522-5839. Archived from the original on August 14, 2024.
^ a b c d e Crawford, Kate (February 20, 2024). “Generative AI’s ecological costs are skyrocketing – and mostly secret”. Nature. 626 (8000 ): 693. Bibcode:2024 Natur.626..693 C. doi:10.1038/ d41586-024-00478-x. PMID 38378831. Archived from the initial on August 22, 2024.
^ a b c d Rogers, Reece. “AI’s Energy Demands Are Out of Control. Welcome to the Internet’s Hyper-Consumption Era”. Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Archived from the initial on August 14, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ a b c d e f Saenko, Kate (May 23, 2023). “Is generative AI bad for the environment? A computer system researcher discusses the carbon footprint of ChatGPT and its cousins”. The Conversation. Archived from the initial on July 1, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ a b Lohr, Steve (August 26, 2024). “Will A.I. Ruin the Planet or Save the Planet?”. The New York City Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on August 26, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Hoffman, Benjamin (June 11, 2024). “First Came ‘Spam.’ Now, With A.I., We have actually Got ‘Slop'”. The New York City Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the initial on August 26, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ a b “Investigation Finds Actual Source of All That AI Slop on Facebook”. Futurism. August 10, 2024. Archived from the original on August 15, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ a b Warzel, Charlie (August 21, 2024). “The MAGA Aesthetic Is AI Slop”. The Atlantic. Archived from the initial on August 25, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Edwards, Benj (August 14, 2024). “Research AI design all of a sudden tries to customize its own code to extend runtime”. Ars Technica. Archived from the initial on August 24, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Hern, Alex; Milmo, Dan (May 19, 2024). “Spam, scrap … slop? The newest wave of AI behind the ‘zombie internet'”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on August 26, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Cox, Joseph (January 18, 2024). “Google News Is Boosting Garbage AI-Generated Articles”. 404 Media. Archived from the initial on June 13, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ “Beloved Local Newspapers Fired Staffers, Then Started Running AI Slop”. Futurism. July 31, 2024. Archived from the original on August 12, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Thompson, Brian; Dhaliwal, Mehak; Frisch, Peter; Domhan, Tobias; Federico, Marcello (August 2024). Ku, Lun-Wei; Martins, Andre; Srikumar, Vivek (eds.). “A Shocking Amount of the Web is Machine Translated: Insights from Multi-Way Parallelism”. Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics ACL 2024. Bangkok, Thailand and virtual meeting: Association for Computational Linguistics: 1763-1775. arXiv:2401.05749. doi:10.18653/ v1/2024. findings-acl.103.
^ Roscoe, Jules (January 17, 2024). “A ‘Shocking’ Amount of the Web Is Already AI-Translated Trash, Scientists Determine”. VICE. Archived from the initial on July 1, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Koebler, Jason (September 19, 2024). “Project Analyzing Human Language Usage Shuts Down Because ‘Generative AI Has Polluted the Data'”. 404 Media. Archived from the initial on September 19, 2024. Retrieved September 20, 2024. While there has actually always been spam on the web and in the datasets that Wordfreq used, “it was manageable and frequently identifiable. Large language designs produce text that masquerades as genuine language with intent behind it, although there is none, and their output turn up all over,” she composed. She offers the example that ChatGPT excessive uses the word “dive,” in such a way that people do not, which has shaken off the frequency of this particular word.
^ Gray, Andrew (March 24, 2024). “ChatGPT “contamination”: estimating the frequency of LLMs in the academic literature”. arXiv:2403.16887 [cs.DL] ^ Kannan, Prabha (May 13, 2024). “How Much Research Is Being Written by Large Language Models?”. Human-Centered Expert System. Stanford University. Retrieved August 16, 2024.
^ Valyaeva, Alina (August 15, 2023). “AI Image Statistics for 2024: How Much Content Was Created by AI”. Everypixel Journal. Retrieved August 16, 2024.
^ Shumailov, Ilia; Shumaylov, Zakhar; Zhao, Yiren; Papernot, Nicolas; Anderson, Ross; Gal, Yarin (July 2024). “AI models collapse when trained on recursively generated information”. Nature. 631 (8022 ): 755-759. Bibcode:2024 Natur.631..755 S. doi:10.1038/ s41586-024-07566-y. PMC 11269175. PMID 39048682.
^ Bhatia, Aatish (August 26, 2024). “When A.I.’s Output Is a Risk to A.I. Itself”. The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ “Self-Consuming Generative Models Go Mad”. ICLR. 2024.
^ Owen, Sean (April 12, 2023). “Synthetic Data for Better Artificial Intelligence”. databricks.com. Archived from the original on January 3, 2024. Retrieved January 4, 2024.
^ Sharma, Himanshu (July 11, 2023). “Synthetic Data Platforms: Unlocking the Power of Generative AI for Structured Data”. kdnuggets.com. Archived from the initial on January 3, 2024. Retrieved January 4, 2024.
^ Stöckl, Andreas (November 2, 2022). “Evaluating a Synthetic Image Dataset Generated with Stable Diffusion”. arXiv:2211.01777 [cs.CV] ^ Roth, Emma (January 25, 2023). “CNET discovered mistakes in more than half of its AI-written stories”. The Verge. Archived from the original on November 6, 2023. Retrieved June 17, 2023.
^ “A publication promoted Michael Schumacher’s first interview in years. It was in fact AI”. NPR. April 28, 2023. Archived from the original on June 17, 2023. Retrieved June 17, 2023.
^ Al-Sibai, Noor (January 3, 2024). “Police Say AI-Generated Article About Local Murder Is “Entirely” Made Up”. Futurism. Archived from the initial on January 5, 2024. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ “NewsBreak: Most downloaded US news app has Chinese roots and ‘composes fiction’ utilizing AI”. Reuters. June 5, 2024. Archived from the original on June 6, 2024. Retrieved June 7, 2024.
^ a b Harrison, Maggie (November 27, 2023). “Sports Illustrated Published Articles by Fake, AI-Generated Writers”. Futurism. Archived from the initial on December 15, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Christian, Jon (February 9, 2023). “Magazine Publishes Serious Errors in First AI-Generated Health Article”. Futurism. Archived from the original on December 26, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Schneider, Jaron (December 14, 2023). “B&H Photo Published an AI-Generated Guide Written by a Phony Person”. PetaPixel. Archived from the initial on January 4, 2024. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Harrison, Maggie (August 29, 2023). “USA Today Owner Pauses AI Articles After Butchering Sports Coverage”. Futurism. Archived from the original on January 4, 2024. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Buchanan, Tyler (August 28, 2023). “Dispatch stops briefly AI sports writing program”. Axios. Archived from the original on January 1, 2024. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Sommer, Will (October 26, 2023). “Mysterious bylines appeared on an U.S.A. Today website. Did these authors exist?”. Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Archived from the original on October 26, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z aa ab air conditioner “Meet AdVon, the AI-Powered Content Monster Infecting the Media Industry”. Futurism. May 8, 2024. Archived from the initial on June 4, 2024. Retrieved June 8, 2024.
^ O’Sullivan, Donie; Gordon, Allison (November 2, 2023). “How Microsoft’s AI is making a mess of the news|CNN Business”. CNN. Archived from the original on November 2, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Meade, Amanda (July 31, 2023). “News Corp using AI to produce 3,000 Australian regional newspaper article a week”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the initial on December 2, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Tangermann, Victor (June 30, 2023). “Gizmodo Staff Furious After Site Announces Relocate To AI Content”. Futurism. Archived from the original on December 6, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ a b c Kafka, Peter (July 18, 2023). “Concerning your internet, whether you like it or not: More AI-generated stories”. Vox. Archived from the initial on July 18, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Landymore, Frank; Christian, Jon (September 13, 2023). “The A.V. Club’s AI-Generated Articles Are Copying Directly From IMDb”. Futurism. Archived from the original on December 6, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Stiaplame, Nordiisk (January 28, 2025). “Quartz Is Publishing AI-Generated Articles Based on Other AI Slop, Along With Warning They May Be Filled With Errors”. Futurism. Archived from the initial on January 29, 2025. Retrieved January 30, 2025.
^ Carroll, Rory (May 14, 2023). “Irish Times apologises for hoax AI short article about females’s usage of phony tan”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on May 14, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Christian, Jon (February 1, 2023). “CNET Sister Site Restarts AI Articles, Immediately Publishes Idiotic Error”. Futurism. Archived from the initial on November 27, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Al-Sibai, Noor; Christian, Jon (March 30, 2023). “BuzzFeed Is Quietly Publishing Entire AI-Generated Articles”. Futurism. Archived from the initial on December 6, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ “Newsweek is making generative AI a component in its newsroom”. Nieman Lab. April 17, 2024. Archived from the original on May 15, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ “What’s in a byline? For Hoodline’s AI-generated local news, everything – and absolutely nothing”. Nieman Lab. June 3, 2024. Archived from the initial on June 6, 2024. Retrieved June 8, 2024.
^ “AI-generated news is here from S.F.-based Hoodline. What does that mean for conventional publishers?”. San Francisco Chronicle. May 8, 2024. Archived from the initial on June 5, 2024. Retrieved June 7, 2024.
^ Gold, Hadas (May 30, 2024). “A nationwide network of local news websites is publishing AI-written articles under fake bylines. Experts are raising alarm”. CNN. Archived from the original on June 6, 2024. Retrieved June 8, 2024.
^ “Wyoming reporter captured using expert system to create phony quotes and stories”. Associated Press. August 14, 2024. Archived from the initial on August 24, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ “Cosmos Magazine publishes AI-generated posts, drawing criticism from reporters, co-founders”. ABC News. August 7, 2024. Archived from the initial on August 24, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ “AI-generated articles are penetrating major news publications”. National Public Radio. May 16, 2024. Archived from the initial on June 19, 2024. Retrieved July 8, 2024.
^ a b c Knibbs, Kate (July 30, 2024). “Zombie Alt-Weeklies Are Stuffed With AI Slop About OnlyFans”. Wired. Archived from the initial on August 11, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ “Apple states it will update AI feature after incorrect news alerts”. The Guardian. January 7, 2025. Archived from the initial on January 14, 2025. Retrieved January 14, 2025.
^ “TV channels are utilizing AI-generated speakers to read the news. The concern is, will we trust them?”. BBC News. January 26, 2024. Archived from the initial on January 26, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Tait, Amelia (October 20, 2023). “‘Here is the news. You can’t stop us’: AI anchor Zae-In grants us an interview”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the initial on January 28, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Kuo, Lily (November 9, 2018). “World’s very first AI news anchor unveiled in China”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the initial on February 20, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ “These ISIS news anchors are AI phonies. Their propaganda is real”. Washington Post. May 17, 2024. Archived from the original on May 19, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Mullin, Benjamin; Grant, Nico (July 20, 2023). “Google Tests A.I. Tool That Has The Ability To Write News Articles”. The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on May 16, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Stenberg, Mark (February 27, 2024). “Google Is Paying Publishers Five-Figure Sums to Test an Unreleased Gen AI Platform”. Adweek. Archived from the initial on March 9, 2024. Retrieved April 17, 2024.
^ Knibbs, Kate (February 7, 2024). “Confessions of an AI Clickbait Kingpin”. Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Archived from the initial on May 18, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Knibbs, Kate (January 26, 2024). “How Beloved Indie Blog ‘The Hairpin’ Became an AI Clickbait Farm”. Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Archived from the initial on April 14, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Koebler, Jason (July 9, 2024). “A Precious Tech Blog Is Now Publishing AI Articles Under the Names of Its Old Human Staff”. 404 Media. Archived from the initial on July 12, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Hollister, Sean (July 10, 2024). “Early Apple tech blog writers are stunned to find their name and work have been AI-zombified”. The Verge. Archived from the initial on July 12, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ “AI slop is currently getting into Oregon’s regional journalism”. Oregon Public Broadcasting. December 9, 2024. Archived from the initial on December 9, 2024. Retrieved December 10, 2024.
^ Knibbs, Kate (February 26, 2024). “How a Little Iowa Newspaper’s Website Became an AI-Generated Clickbait Factory”. Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Archived from the initial on February 26, 2024. Retrieved December 10, 2024.
^ Koebler, Jason; Cole, Samantha; Maiberg, Emanuel; Cox, Joseph (January 26, 2024). “We Need Your Email Address”. 404 Media. Archived from the initial on December 2, 2024. Retrieved December 10, 2024.
^ “Meet the Serbian Businessman/DJ Who Runs the Zombie AI Southwest Journal – Racket”. Racket. February 16, 2024. Archived from the original on November 13, 2024. Retrieved December 10, 2024.
^ Lima-Strong, Cristiano (January 11, 2024). “Senators caution AI might result in ‘damage’ of regional news”. Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Archived from the original on January 11, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ “OpenAI strikes $5 million-plus local news offer”. Axios. July 18, 2023. Archived from the original on July 19, 2023. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Kelly, Heather (May 22, 2024). “Meta walked away from news. Now the business’s using it for AI material”. Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Archived from the initial on May 22, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ “How WIRED Will Use Generative AI Tools”. Wired. Archived from the original on December 30, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Barrett, Amanda (November 15, 2018). “Standards around generative AI”. Associated Press. Archived from the original on September 23, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Viner, Katharine; Bateson, Anna (June 16, 2023). “The Guardian’s method to generative AI”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on January 3, 2024. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Becker, K. B.; Simon, F. M.; Crum, C. (2023 ). “Policies in parallel? A comparative study of journalistic AI policies in 52 international news organisations”. pp. 8-9. doi:10.31235/ osf.io/ c4af9.
^ Newman, Nic; Fletcher, Richard; Robertson, Craig T.; Arguedas, Amy Ross; Nielsen, Rasmus Fleis (June 2024). “Digital News Report 2024” (PDF). Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.